Spending every visit between papers and screens can leave little room for what really matters in medical care. There are now tools that make it possible to save time and improve the quality of clinical documentation without technical complications. Some offer help with diagnoses and summaries in seconds, others make it possible to work in several languages or to learn the style of each professional. There are options for those who want to automate tasks, find medical evidence instantly or simply gain a few more hours of peace of mind during the week. How do they achieve this and which one is best suited to each need? Find out how technology can transform day-to-day practice.
Table of Contents
Itaca
Quick summary
Itaca is an AI assistant designed specifically for healthcare professionals that automates clinical documentation and supports decision making. In seconds it generates SOAP notes, records consultations in the background, and provides medical answers with citations from authoritative sources to support your recommendations. Your goal is clear: reduce administrative burden so you spend more time with the patient; the limitations noted (use on your own platform, limits on the free version, and need for integration with clinical systems) are understood as design decisions aimed at security and data control.
Main functions
Itaca combines automatic SOAP note generation, background recording of consultations, clinical decision assistants with differential diagnoses and treatment suggestions, medical responses with appointments linked to authoritative sources, medical case analysis and automatic patient call summaries. It also incorporates security and privacy measures through encryption and access control to ensure that clinical information remains under your team's control.
Advantages
- Saves significant administrative time: can reduce up to 10 hours per week on paperwork, freeing up clinical hours for direct care.
- Improves documentation quality: automatic generation of SOAP notes in seconds produces structured and consistent records that facilitate tracking.
- Actionable diagnostic support: the clinical decision assistant proposes differential diagnoses and treatment options that help validate and enrich your clinical judgment.
- Linked and verifiable evidence: medical responses include citations to authoritative sources, reinforcing confidence in the information shared with patients and colleagues.
- Data security and control: encryption and access control ensure that patient data is protected and under the governance of the professional.
- Real-world practice: presence in more than 30 countries and the confidence of 15,000 professionals support its clinical adoption.
Who it is for
Itaca is designed for physicians and healthcare professionals looking to optimize their clinical workflow and documentation management: outpatient physicians, residents who need writing support, specialists who analyze complex cases, and clinical teams who want to consolidate information with traceability and evidence.
Unique value proposition
Itaca's value proposition lies in its end-to-end clinical approach: it is not a generic tool, but a platform that integrates instant documentation (SOAP notes), consultation recording, diagnostic decision support, automatic summaries and verifiable appointment responses. This combination reduces administrative time, improves the quality of the clinical record and provides traceability of the evidence cited. In addition, security measures (encryption and access control) and operation on its own platform reinforce confidentiality and control over data, a priority for any healthcare institution. In practice, Itaca replaces several manual processes with an integrated flow designed for clinical reality, which makes it superior in functional coherence and security compared to fragmented solutions.
Real use case
A physician records a consultation with Itaca; upon completion, the platform automatically generates the SOAP note, suggests differential diagnoses and treatment options with appointments, and creates a summary of the call ready to share with the patient and team. Result: recovered hours per week and better documented decisions.
Prices
Free level available; Pro from $29/month.
Web site
Website: https://itaca.ai
Glass Health
Quick summary
Glass Health is an AI-based clinical decision support platform designed to assist the clinician in real time during patient care. In a nutshell: it provides automated drafts of differential diagnoses, plans, and answers to clinical questions with evidence-based quotes, which supports efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. Its integration into clinical workflows and its broad pharmacological catalog make it useful in environments where speed and documentary support are required. However, it requires clinical supervision and is not oriented to image analysis or in vitro diagnostic signals.
Main features
Glass generates draft differential diagnoses, assessments and therapeutic plans, and answers clinical reference questions citing evidence. It provides real-time environmental decision support during consultation, quick access to evidence-based guidelines and protocols, and integrates with clinical workflows. It has an extensive drug database (more than 154,000 drugs) and aggressive search tools that synthesize medical literature and up-to-date guidelines to inform recommendations.
Advantages
- Point-of-care support: Glass offers real-time assistance during the patient encounter, which can accelerate clinical decision making.
- Evidence-based guidelines and citations: It provides answers accompanied by references, facilitating the verification and documentary support of medical decisions.
- Improved clinical efficiency: Automates draft notes and plans, which can reduce administrative burden and documentation time.
- Integration with clinical flows: It is designed to fit into existing clinical processes, minimizing adoption friction.
- Extensive pharmacological catalog: The drug database is extensive, which helps in the review of interactions, doses and therapeutic alternatives.
Cons
- Not suitable for image analysis or in vitro diagnostics: Its core functions do not cover medical image processing or laboratory signals for instrumental diagnostics.
- EHR integration not detailed: The content provided does not specify limitations or the exact scope of integration with existing electronic health record systems.
- Dependence on clinical supervision: The platform can generate recommendations that require verification by the clinician, which requires active professional judgment.
Who it is for
Glass is intended for clinicians-primary care physicians, specialists, and hospital staff-who are looking for AI-based support to improve diagnostic accuracy, streamline therapeutic planning, and reduce documentation burden. It is especially useful for those who value cited evidence support and need quick access to pharmacological information and clinical guidelines.
Unique value proposition
Glass' proposal combines real-time decision support, clinical answers with evidence-based citations and an agentive search that synthesizes updated literature, all integrated into clinical workflows. Its differential value lies in providing informed recommendations during the consultation, together with documentation tools that optimize clinical time.
Real use case
A consulting physician uses Glass to generate, in minutes, a prioritized differential diagnosis, management plan and relevant references, then exports the draft as a progress note or discharge summary, expediting documentation and supporting the decision with cited sources.
Prices
Not specified.
Website: https://glass.health
heidi ai
Quick summary
heidi ai is a healthcare innovation platform that acts as an AI-based care companion to assist clinicians in automating notes, summaries, follow-ups and administrative tasks. In practice, it reduces administrative burden and improves efficiency in clinical documentation, and offers a free version for easy access. Its focus on multilingual transcription and integration with electronic records makes it especially relevant for diverse clinical environments. Overall, it is a solid choice for organizations looking to delegate administrative tasks without losing control over security and compliance.
Main features
The tool offers automatic note capture and AI-driven summary generation, transcription in more than 110 languages, automatic referral and handout generation, and integration with electronic health record (EHR) systems. It also applies codes and manages post-consultation tasks on an ongoing basis, allowing you to turn a clinical consultation into documented actions and operational tasks with less manual intervention.
Advantages
- Reduces the administrative burden on clinicians: Automating notes and summaries allows clinical staff to spend more time on direct patient care.
- Adaptable to multiple clinical settings and specialties: It supports a wide range of care scenarios, facilitating its adoption in outpatient, inpatient and training settings.
- High security and compliance: It is presented as a highly secure solution that complies with global standards, a critical factor for handling sensitive patient information.
- Validated in practice and under continuous improvement: It has been validated in real environments with continuous refinement of the model, providing confidence in its evolution.
- Free version available: It offers free general access, which facilitates evaluation and initial adoption by individuals and centers with limited resources.
Disadvantages
- Complex pricing structure: The existence of multiple levels and business options can make it difficult to directly compare costs in organizations with different needs.
- Technological dependence and need for training: Requires training and adaptation on the part of the team; technology does not eliminate the institutional learning curve.
- Limited information on detailed integrations and customization: The specific details of which EHRs are integrated and what degree of customization is possible are not fully described, which may raise questions in complex implementations.
Who it is for
heidi ai is designed for individual clinicians, care teams and healthcare organizations looking to reduce administrative tasks and improve the quality of clinical documentation through AI. It is suitable for physicians in training who need documentation support, as well as for hospitals and centers with multilingual needs and high volume of consultations.
Unique value proposition
Its approach combines automation of clinical documentation (notes and summaries), transcription capabilities in more than 110 languages, and connection with EHRs to transform consultations into coded tasks and automatic follow-ups. This allows clinical teams to focus on the patient while the platform manages the administrative side.
Real use case
A hospital implements heidi ai to automate the note-taking process for its clinicians; as a result, physicians spend less time in front of the screen, job satisfaction improves, and service productivity increases thanks to automatically generated summaries and tasks.
Prices
Pro from $90 per user/month; customizable business plans.
Website: https://heidihealth.com
EvidenceHunt
Quick summary
EvidenceHunt facilitates structured access to medical literature and guidelines, with advanced search tools and customization options geared towards clinical research. It is not a medical advice platform, but an assistant for locating and processing evidence. In practice, it stands out for its ability to filter complex results and for collaborative functions designed for teams and organizations.
Main features
EvidenceHunt offers access to medical literature and guidelines, powered by sophisticated search tools with multiple filters. It incorporates a chat for research queries, customizable response formatting and an evidence processing system that improves the ranking of relevant articles. In addition, it provides user management and organizational options in enterprise plans.
Advantages
- Broad and robust search: It allows locating guides and articles with filters that refine clinical and methodological results, saving hours of manual screening.
- Customizable functions: Adjustable response formatting and instructions make it easy to adapt outputs to internal protocols or academic presentations.
- Integrated chat for research: Chat interaction speeds up quick evidence queries without leaving the platform.
- Organizational tools in the company: User administration and collaborative functions support work in research teams and clinical departments.
- Test options: The existence of a trial makes it possible to evaluate the usefulness before committing resources.
Disadvantages
- It is not a substitute for clinical advice: EvidenceHunt is designed for research support and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical consultation.
- Complex pricing structure: Although a free plan is available, paid plans and business options may require financial commitments and prior evaluation.
- Focused on organizations and researchers: The platform may be oversized for individual users who only need one-off searches.
Who it is for
EvidenceHunt is ideal for researchers, clinicians participating in literature reviews, quality units and committees designing protocols, and healthcare organizations that need to manage evidence in an orderly fashion. Whether you coordinate systematic reviews, clinical guideline updates or hospital policies, you will find tangible value in its capabilities.
Unique value proposition
EvidenceHunt's approach is to combine advanced search, intelligent evidence processing and customization options to deliver ordered and relevant results to clinical and research teams. This combination reduces screening time and improves the practical applicability of the evidence found.
Real use case
A hospital research team uses EvidenceHunt to locate the latest guidelines on condition management and to rank articles by methodological relevance. With embeddable chat and custom formatting, they turn selected evidence into abstracts ready for clinical committee discussion and protocol updates.
Prices
Pricing: Free plan available; paid plans from 16.5 EUR/month billed annually; additional business options.
Website: https://evidencehunt.com
Freed
At first sight
Freed is an AI-powered medical scribe specifically designed to reduce clinical recording time and improve note quality. It offers one-click note transfer, templates by specialty, and highly accurate clinical transcription in more than 14 languages, all under HIPAA-compliant security measures. Overall, it is a targeted alternative for those looking to automate charting without relying on generic tools; however, some features are in beta and require initial customization.
Main functions
Freed centralizes the documentation flow: recording of visits (face-to-face and virtual), automatic generation of transcripts and notes, and direct submission to the EHR with a single click. Its AI learns from user corrections to adopt custom styles and offers specialty-specific templates, shared as a team and editable with a template builder. It supports recording upload, iOS/Android apps, Chrome extension and clinical safety compliance for healthcare environments.
Advantages
- Significantly reduces charting time: Freed automates the capture and writing of notes, freeing up weekly hours for direct patient care.
- High clinical accuracy in transcription: The platform is oriented to medical terminology and promises clinical accuracy in multiple languages, improving the quality of the record.
- Simple and straightforward workflow: The «record, generate, review and send» process facilitates daily adoption without superfluous steps.
- Compatibility with multiple devices: Mobile applications and web extension can be integrated into face-to-face consultations and telemedicine.
- Security and compliance: HIPAA-focused measures and secure data handling, a must for clinical environments.
- Commercial flexibility: Plans for individual clinicians and organizations, with discount options for large groups and training.
Disadvantages
- High price for small practices: The cost of approximately $90/month per clinician can be onerous for practices with tight budgets.
- Beta functions with limitations: Features such as push to EHR are in beta and may show limited stability or scope depending on the integration.
- Initial adoption curve: Requires training and flow adjustment, which can affect productivity during transition.
Who it is for
Freed is designed for physicians, providers and healthcare organizations looking to reduce administrative burden without sacrificing clinical accuracy. It is especially useful for clinics with high patient volume, hybrid practices (telemedicine + in-person), and teams that value specialized templates and data security.
Unique value proposition
Freed's proposal lies in being a «purpose-built» clinical scribe: it is not a generic extension, but a charting-focused solution that learns from the user, offers templates by specialty and guarantees health security. Its advantage is to optimize clinical documentation in a specific, non-generalist way.
Real use case
In a primary care practice, Freed allows you to record the visit, generate the automatic note and send it to the EHR with a single click, allowing the physician to focus on the patient, reduce desk time and improve professional satisfaction.
Prices
From $90/month per clinician; free trial available and discounts for students, residents and large groups.
Website: https://getfreed.ai
Lyrebird Health
Quick summary
Lyrebird Health is an AI-based clinical scribe designed for physicians and healthcare professionals that automates documentation during the consultation. It listens in the background, generates clinical notes and documents in less than 20 seconds, and promises to integrate with electronic records systems to minimize administrative burden. Its focus on privacy and practitioner-style learning makes it attractive for busy consultations, although it requires patient consent and an internet connection to function.
Main features
Lyrebird automates clinical documentation by listening to consultations and producing notes, summaries, referrals, certificates and reports ready for transfer to the electronic medical record. It generates notes quickly (less than 20 seconds), enables AI-assisted editing, and learns the practitioner's style over time through corrections and documents you upload. It offers one-click transfer to multiple EMRs and supports dictation, document creation and editing to tailor output to your clinical needs.
Advantages
- It drastically reduces documentation time, saving hours per week and allowing more time to be devoted to patient care.
- It learns and adapts to the professional's style, improving consistency and reducing the need to edit notes manually.
- Manages audio and data with a focus on privacy and compliance, minimizing risks related to information protection.
- It integrates seamlessly with various electronic health record systems and offers manual copying options if direct integration is not possible.
- Supports dictation and creation of different clinical documents, providing flexibility in documentation management.
Cons
- It requires obtaining patient consent prior to use, which adds a preliminary step in the clinical routine.
- It depends on an internet connection for its web operation, so its usefulness is reduced in environments with limited connectivity.
- It is limited to professionals and cases that fit within its scope of documentation and may not cover all specialized clinical scenarios.
- Price, especially in Pro and team plans, can be a barrier for individual practitioners or small clinics.
Who it is for
Lyrebird is designed for physicians, family practitioners, specialists and healthcare organizations that need an efficient and compliant solution for clinical documentation. If your practice generates a volume of notes and documents and you are looking to reduce the administrative burden without sacrificing privacy, Lyrebird may be a good choice.
Unique value proposition
Its strength is to combine real-time automated transcription with personalized learning of the practitioner's style and direct transfers to EMR, offering a documentation chain that aims to save time and maintain clinical consistency.
Real use case
One concrete example: Dr. Nick Carr, a general practitioner, saves about 8 hours per week in documentation thanks to Lyrebird, which has improved his interaction with patients and reduced the administrative burden in his practice.
Prices
Lyrebird offers a free version with 50 shares per month, an Essential plan at $0, a Pro plan starting at $200 per user per month (billed annually) and Enterprise options with custom pricing; the Pro and Enterprise plans include unlimited shares and additional features.
Website: https://lyrebirdhealth.com
Clinical Documentation Tools Comparison
This table provides a clear and concise comparison of various AI-based clinical documentation tools to help healthcare professionals reduce the administrative burden and improve the quality of clinical notes.
| Product | Key Features | Advantages | Disadvantages | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Itaca | Automated SOAP notes, query recording, clinical decisions, security, verifiable responses | Significant time savings, document quality, diagnostic support, linked evidence, security | Needs integration with clinical systems | Free; Pro from $29/month |
| Glass Health | Differential diagnoses, therapeutic plans, evidence-based responses, real-time support, pharmacologic catalog | Immediate consultation support, improved efficiency, integration into clinical workflows | Not suitable for in vitro imaging/diagnostics, EHR integration not detailed | Not specified |
| heidi ai | Automated notes, transcription in 110 languages, EHR integration, automated tracking | Reduced administrative burden, multilingual adaptability, security, free version | Complex pricing, need for training, limited information on integrations | Free; Pro from $90/month, corporate |
| EvidenceHunt | Advanced medical literature search, collaborative tools | Robust search, customization, organizational features, testing available | No substitute for clinical advice, complex pricing structure | Free; from 16.5 EUR/month |
| Freed | Automated capture, transcription accuracy, straight-through workflow, mobile apps, HIPAA compliance | Reduced charting, transcription accuracy, easy workflow, security | High price, features in beta, adoption curve | From $90/month per clinician |
| Lyrebird | Quick note generation, learn professional style, EMR integration, privacy management, document dictation, and more. | Reduced documentation time, customization to the professional's style, data privacy, flexible integration | Requires patient consent, internet dependency, limited for complex specialties | Pro from $200/month, Enterprise options |
Looking for a truly safe and adapted AI alternative for physicians?
Are you concerned about data privacy when using tools like ChatGPT in your practice? If comparing alternatives has left you with doubts about the security and accuracy of these systems for medicine, it's time to learn about a solution made for clinicians. Explore our specific tips and advice for physicians and discover workflows that save you hours and focus your attention on the patient.
Don't put your patients' sensitive information at risk or waste time with general options. With Itaca.ai, You can automate SOAP notes, support diagnoses with medical evidence and manage all your documentation tasks in compliance with the highest standards of security and health data control. Ready to transform your practice today? Also visit our guide to advanced functionalities and take the next step in clinical efficiency.
FAQ
What features should I look for in an alternative to ChatGPT for physicians?
Look for specific features such as automatic generation of clinical notes, real-time documentation capabilities and clinical decision support. Prioritize tools that offer integration with electronic medical records to optimize your workflow.
How can these tools save time in medical documentation?
Most alternatives to ChatGPT are designed to automate the writing process, which can reduce the time spent on documentation by up to 50%. Implement one of these tools and evaluate the time savings in a week to see how efficient it is.
What is the most effective way to integrate these tools into my medical practice?
Start with basic training for staff on the use of the new tool and establish a clear protocol for its use. Be sure to conduct follow-up sessions to optimize its use and resolve doubts in the first few weeks.
What kind of clinical decision support do these alternatives offer?
Alternatives to ChatGPT often include support for differential diagnoses and evidence-based treatment suggestions. Consider using these features during your consultations to validate your diagnosis and increase trust with your patients.
Can I use these tools on different devices during my consultations?
Yes, many of these alternatives are designed to work on multiple devices, including mobiles and tablets. Check compatibility when selecting a tool to ensure that you can access information anywhere.
Are there free versions of ChatGPT alternatives for physicians?
Some of these tools offer free versions with limited features that may be useful for evaluating their usefulness. Try these versions before making a financial commitment to make sure they fit your needs.
Leave a Reply